Why Israel Matters to Americans part one

 Jews and Israel in the American consciousness and imagination.

 

Why Israel Matters to Americans

Israel is the victor. It is a pioneer. An innovator. It took land without a people and made it blossom at the hands of a people without a land. Israel is necessary. Israel is a haven. It is moral. It is a democracy. Israel is... Israel is... America. Israel occupies, no pun intended, a unique position in the American news media landscape, in its political landscape, and, more than anywhere else, in the American consciousness and imagination.

There is an assumption of virtue, of a greater good, in America's official history that has been consciously reproduced by Israel's advocates for a large part of the last century in an attempt to Americanize the Israeli project. And so when the curtain is pulled away to reveal the violence that upholds Israel's existence, there is an understanding from the United States of the "necessity" of this violence. Because Israeli violence is necessary to protect Israel from threats to its exceptional existence. Just as American violence is necessary to protect the United States from threats to its exceptional existence.

How Israel is covered in the U.S. news and popular media serves to obscure the biggest thing that ties the United States and Israel together. They're both settler colonial states which have been built on the displacement and ethnic cleansing of other peoples.

And so to tell the story of Israel in U.S. news media has required, for over seven decades, the disappearance of Palestinians, their history, and their right to their homeland. Because a cultural narrative about Israel where Palestinians and their history are front and center, would also then require that we are honest about the violence that belies every part of the myth of American exceptionalism.

Welcome to “Blog,” where I tell you the whole story.

 

Making Israel without Palestine.

 

In the seven decades since Israel was established as a state in the British mandate of Palestine, American engagement - ideological, political, cultural - with the Jewish state has seen different iterations.

But at its core, these iterations have relied on being a mirror of the American nation. And in that mirroring, Israel has been assigned a duality, as both the victim and victor.

Israel is a victor, emerging from one of the cruelest crimes of the 20th century as a successful, unified people who have built a formidable nation despite thousands of years in a persecuted diaspora.

For a cultural history that extolls shared values, it must build those shared values in opposition to other ideas, other values, and in the case of state and nationalist identities, other people. U.S. News and popular media have built a case for Israel

reliant on the disappearance of Palestinians and any claim they have to their land. On the disappearance of their history of ethnic cleansing, the theft of their lands, and their ever-expanding diaspora.

 

Making Palestinians the best pitiful victims.

 

Making Palestinians the best pitiful victims.

A counter-narrative to the American story about Israel that would be told from the Palestinian vantage point would also indict the sustained American histories and realities of violence against its Indigenous and Black populations. Thus, Palestinians must be made into, at best, pitiful victims caught as collateral in Israel's attempt to defend itself, and at worst, as generation after generation of “terrorist” threats.

In both representations of Palestinians, the purpose of the state of Israel, the political status quo, and its carefully curated image remain intact. Even when Israeli crimes and transgressions beyond the expanding occupation, land theft, and apartheid are clear, Israel's moral authority isn't questioned.

Questioning that moral authority is akin to questioning the necessity of Israel. So how did we get to this point, where deference to Israel's moral power is reflexive and unquestioned, a privilege not enjoyed by other countries and nations?

It's too reductive to think that a pro-Israel lobby is alone in building Israel in the American landscape, that they alone have had this power. It's also not enough to look at U.S. foreign policy interests in the region as the sole determinant of Israel's narrative power in U.S. news and popular media.

Both those things are central, of course, but what brings it all together is the cultural history of Israel in the United States,

Click here to read part 2

Comments